One Size Never Fits All

"Reconcilable Differences? Standards-based Teaching and Differentiation"

One size fits all. Really? Wow what a concept but it doesn't really work, does it? Well it does if you are right in the middle all the time. Sort of like those things they have you wear at the hospital - You know what I am talking about so I will leave you with your mental picture. Not pretty is it? I have never been able to buy gloves that were fashionable or warm. Any watch I have ever purchased has to have the band replaced. Hands to big, wrists to large. How many stores sell men's size 15 dress shoes?

So imagine being the student who is extremely smart or fast to pick up concepts or who has a family where education is extremely important so they are better prepared than students their own age. Now imagine the opposite of all those things or just being a student who is motivated to do the work but things don't come easy. Teachers must teach to the full spectrum of student readiness, interest and learning profile not through "One Size Fits All" methods and without regards to standards-based instruction. The full spectrum is ROYGBIV and is all encompassing not just the visible white light. This is my definition of a diverse classroom and rationale for differentiated instruction. Standards-based instruction approaches need to be assessed in ways that make an impact on the gifted or academically challenged students who are outside the usual norms of achievement.

Primary and secondary teachers complain about teaching to the test. Well there is a reason society created the tests and standards. We discussed a number of these in class. There is a reason colleges and universities only admit students after reviewing ACT and SAT scores. Employers also want to know if the education the prospective employee received has the same quality and measures up to the other prospective job candidates. You hear the horror stories of advance students being idle and how borderline and low motivation students are being moved to Special Education so their scores won't reflect poorly on the teachers, school, administrators, school board and the community. In the Tomlinson article she lists the following bullet points as questions educators need to ask themselves about how they are teaching.

· Do the standards reflect the knowledge, understandings, and skills valued most by experts in the disciplines that they represent?

· Are we using standards as a curriculum, or are they reflected in the curriculum?

· Are we slavishly covering standards at breakneck pace, or have we found ways to organize the standards within our curriculum so that students have time to make sense of ideas and skills?

· Does our current focus on standards enliven classrooms, or does it eliminate joy, creativity, and inquiry?

· Do standards make learning more or less relevant and alluring to students?

· Does our use of standards remind us that we are teaching human beings, or does it cause us to forget that fact?

She goes on to say, that if your "practices yield positive answers", then move forward fast in differentiating your class room with "adaptations that address the needs of academically diverse learners." If your "answers are less than satisfactory" problems need to be addressed. Because "such problems… point to cracks in the foundation of quality teaching and learning, and we diminish our profession by failing to attend to them." This is what I meant earlier when I said, “without regard” it must be done the students are counting on you.

Further into the article, Tomlinson continues that the problem is not a disconnect between standards and instruction. She says, "The problem lies in an ill-conceived interpretation and use of standards" that diminish the real structure of "effective teaching and learning." "The problem is not that we can't attend to the needs of individual learners, but rather that we've lost the essential frameworks of the disciplines in addition to the coherence, understanding, purpose, and joy in learning. Our first obligation is to ensure that standards-based teaching practice does not conflict with best teaching practices. Once those are aligned, differentiation—or attention to the diverse needs of learners—follows naturally."

I think what she is saying is that teachers taught as they were taught so now they are missing a sense of coherence, understanding and purpose. Teaching is as much an art as a science but it also must be a calling. There must be joy freely given and received. But most people get into that rut at work and find a comfort zone that allowed them to feel good about what they have been doing. Now they are being told not just to do it differently, but we decided that you weren't doing it so well after all. What a blow to confidence and self esteem that must have been to the teaching community. She says once you align standards-based teaching with best teaching practice you can move on to what is truly important. And when your heart is pure and mind is clear then attention to the needs of diverse learners will follow.

I really enjoyed reading this piece. I reread it a number of times and just kept finding more and more in it.